söndag 15 februari 2015

^^ Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

It will have no doubt when you are going to select this book. This motivating On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill publication could be checked out entirely in certain time relying on exactly how commonly you open up as well as review them. One to bear in mind is that every book has their very own production to obtain by each viewers. So, be the excellent viewers as well as be a far better person after reading this book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill

On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill



On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

This is it the book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill to be best seller lately. We offer you the most effective deal by obtaining the magnificent book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill in this site. This On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill will not only be the type of book that is difficult to find. In this site, all sorts of books are offered. You could browse title by title, writer by writer, and publisher by author to figure out the very best book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill that you can read now.

This letter might not affect you to be smarter, yet the book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill that we offer will stimulate you to be smarter. Yeah, at least you'll understand greater than others who don't. This is what called as the top quality life improvisation. Why needs to this On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill It's since this is your preferred style to review. If you such as this On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill theme about, why don't you review guide On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill to enrich your conversation?

The here and now book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill we offer below is not type of normal book. You understand, reviewing now does not indicate to take care of the published book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill in your hand. You could get the soft data of On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill in your device. Well, we suggest that the book that we proffer is the soft data of the book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill The material and all things are very same. The distinction is only the forms of the book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill, whereas, this condition will specifically be profitable.

We discuss you additionally the method to obtain this book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill without visiting the book shop. You can continuously see the link that we supply and ready to download On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill When many people are busy to look for fro in guide establishment, you are really simple to download and install the On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill here. So, exactly what else you will choose? Take the motivation here! It is not only providing the best book On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), By John Stuart Mill but additionally the appropriate book collections. Here we consistently give you the very best and also easiest means.

On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill

Discussed and debated from time immemorial, the concept of personal liberty went without codification until the 1859 publication of On Liberty. John Stuart Mill's complete and resolute dedication to the cause of freedom inspired this treatise, an enduring work through which the concept remains well known and studied.
The British economist, philosopher, and ethical theorist's argument does not focus on "the so-called Liberty of the Will…but Civil, or Social Liberty: the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual." Mill asks and answers provocative questions relating to the boundaries of social authority and individual sovereignty. In powerful and persuasive prose, he declares that there is "one very simple principle" regarding the use of coercion in society — one may only coerce others either to defend oneself or to defend others from harm.
The new edition offers students of political science and philosophy, in an inexpensive volume, one of the most influential studies on the nature of individual liberty and its role in a democratic society.

  • Sales Rank: #84099 in eBooks
  • Published on: 2012-03-01
  • Released on: 2012-03-01
  • Format: Kindle eBook

Review
Mill's On Liberty stands among the most important achievements in the history of political thought. His arguments are as pertinent today as ever. This much-needed new edition is especially useful, as it includes Steven M. Cahn's helpful annotations as well as an excellent Introduction and thought-provoking Study Guide by C. L. Ten. (Talisse, Robert B. ) --Guide by C. L. Ten. (Talisse, Robert B. )

Review
"A wonderful edition. The introduction is splendid, and having comments, critiques and reviews as appendices is excellent. One can only hope that this edition becomes standard in colleges and universities." (Irving Louis Horowitz )

"The introduction offers fresh insights [and] the background readings provide much illumination into aspects of Mill's thought that may not be apparent to the modern reader." (Thomas Christiano )

"With an impressively compact and engaging introduction and a well-chosen selection of ancillary materials, Edward Alexander's edition of On Liberty is an excellent choice for undergraduate courses, and will please nineteenth-century specialists as well." (Eileen Gillooly )

"Edward Alexander's work is not just another edition of Mill's On Liberty. In addition to a solid introduction and the text itself, the reader encounters a wealth of material essential to placing the work in its historical and philosophical context: de Tocqueville on majoritarian rule; some of Mill’s early letters discussing themes developed at greater length in On Liberty; his own comments about his work; and comments by contemporaries of Mill, both informal remarks and sustained discussions. Alexander should be commended for making this invaluable material accessible to scholars and students of Mill, of liberalism, of political philosophy, and of the history of ideas." (Maria H. Moralies )

From the Publisher
Library of Liberal Arts title.

Most helpful customer reviews

91 of 93 people found the following review helpful.
More relevant today than in 1859 :(
By B. Alcat
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was interested in the nature of Civil Liberty, and the limits to the power that a Government can legitimately exercise upon its citizens. He believed that some worrying tendencies could be observed in the England society of his time, and tried to warn others about them.
The author basically explains his ideas regarding the preservation of individual liberties, not only due to the fact that they are rights owed to everyone, but also because they benefit society as a whole.
For example, when he says that liberty of thought and of discussion must be preserved, he tells us that "Wrong opinions and practices gradually yield to fact and argument: but fact and arguments, to produce any effect on the mind, must be brought before it". How can mistaken beliefs or actions be proven wrong, if dissent is forbidden?. The loss for society is clear: "If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth; if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error".
In order to preserve the liberties included in the concept of Civil Liberty, the author points out that there must be limits to the action of the Government. He says that "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". Any other reason is simply not good enough. Thus, Stuart Mill highlights the rights of the individual, but also the limit to those rights: the well-being of others.
"On Liberty" is not too long, and I think you are highly likely to enjoy it, if you can get past the first few pages. The problem is that even though the ideas in this book are quite modern, the language is somehow dated. But then, we must remember that "On Liberty" was written a long time ago...
Notwithstanding that, do your best to read the first pages, and you will realize that after a while it will be much easier. This book is well-worth the effort you need to make at the beginning, because it is even more relevant today than when it was first published, in 1859.
Are individual rights important?. Why?. Do they have a limit?. You will found the answer for these questions, and much more, in "On Liberty". What else can I say?. I believe this is a book that will help you to reflect on many important issues... I certainly can't think of a better reason to read it. All in all, recommended :)
Belen Alcat

29 of 30 people found the following review helpful.
Liberty based on utilitarianism rather than human rights
By Derek Jones
This Kindle edition has an introduction written more than a century ago that offers no insight into Mill's essay and deals almost entirely with the relationship between Mill and Harriet Taylor. It is therefore primarily of general rather than academic interest.

"On Liberty" is one of the most important books on political thought of the nineteenth century. Fortunately for the 21st century reader it is also one of the most accessible. Mill was a libertarian who chose not to base his defence of liberty on natural rights but on his own revised version of utilitarianism:
"I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions...grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being."
This enables Mill to argue that freedom is needed if man is to be able to explore all the avenues of human development that allow the human race to progress. Total freedom is impossible so what determines the legitimate boundaries of freedom? Mill distinguishes between self-regarding and other-regarding actions. The former should never be interfered with and the latter subject to limitation only if they harm the legitimate rights of others.

For Mill free thought is a self-regarding action which should not be curtailed, and free thought is virtually useless without free speech. Mill then proceeds to add a utilitarian argument in favour of free speech: if an opinion is silenced then mankind is necessarily the loser whether the opinion is true or false. He advances a number of arguments to support this, concluding with the claim that a climate of freedom is essential for "great thinkers" and "it is as much, and even more indispensable to enable average human beings to attain the mental stature they are capable of." He has no truck with paternalists seeking to guide people's thoughts in the "right" direction. He was equally hostile to the idea that people had the right not to be offended; hence he opposed the blasphemy law. The single case Mill gives of an acceptable limitation of free speech is the case of corn-dealers and an excited mob. An opinion expressed in a newspaper that corn-dealers are "starvers of the poor" is legitimate, but the same view stated to an angry mob outside the corn-dealer's home may be limited if it "is a positive instigation to a mischievous act."

Mill concedes that actions cannot be as free as speech and seeks to establish the proper limits of freedom of action. Mill proposes that "the sole end for which mankind are warranted...in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number is self-protection." Because he rejects paternalism he opposes all interference with self-regarding actions. Mill would not have prevented people from taking drugs and he would have led the opposition to seat belt legislation. Mill even rejects state interference with liberty for the sake of crime prevention, e.g. poisons can be used for criminal purposes. Mill was willing to accept a register of their sale but not the banning of them. Mill believes we must not interfere with the "rights"of others but these are narrowly circumscribed and Mill makes it clear that "rights" are not the same as "interests". Hence cut-throat laissez-faire is legitimate. As for moral decency arguments Mill does say that sexual intercourse in public is unacceptable, and though fornication and gambling are acceptable he is in two minds about whether pimps and casino-owners should be allowed to operate. Mill says it is a difficult case that is on the borderline, but adds that in general we must resist attempts to limit behaviour for "moral" reasons because any such action is likely to be the thin end of the wedge.

Though Mill is a very determined anti-paternalist he makes three exceptions: children, primitive societies and the disabled. Children must be guided until they reach maturity and they must be given compulsory education - something not given legislative force when he wrote. As for primitive societies, we must resist the notion that Mill was a typical Victorian believing in the "white man's burden" or inherent differences between races. He simply observed the reality of the world in the mid-nineteenth century but made it very clear any intervention in backward societies must be temporary with the aim to bring about self-government as soon as possible.

Hence Mill was a much more determined libertarian than most modern writers on the subject. There is just one example where, at first sight, Mill may seem reactionary to modern readers. He wished to restrict the right to have children to those who could prove that they could support them. However, those who today wish others to be allowed to procreate at will do so on the grounds of human rights. Mill based his theories on utilitarianism, and not on rights. There was no welfare state when Mill wrote "On Liberty" and he was concerned with the well-being of children born to people without the means to support them.

In view of the alleged growing restrictions on freedom in many democratic countries this is a book well worth reading. In particular I like Mill's argument that every restriction on freedom is the thin end of the wedge, providing a justification for further restrictions.

21 of 22 people found the following review helpful.
On Liberty: More Relevant Than Ever
By Len Hart
In his classic essay "On Liberty", John Stuart Mill deals with the issue of "civil liberties" -not the metaphysical issue of "free will". While most attacks on civil liberties have historically occurred from the right within the context of a tyrannical or an aristocratic rule, Mill deals with threats against liberty from within the institutions of democracy itself. The issue is especially relevant at a time when widespread domestic wiretapping and surveillance violates the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The aim of early libertarians was to limit the power of the ruler over those governed; Mill, however, identifies a need to limit the power of elected governments and officials as well. Mill is not merely addressing the issue of "who should rule?", he seeks to establish limits on the power that government may exercise over minorities and individuals. His work is more relevant now than ever.

While "government of the people" is an ideal to be aspired to, Mill argues that such an ideal is often not the case in fact. He argues that those exerting the power of the government -elected officials, bureaucrats, the judiciary -often develop their own interests. They are sometimes influenced by those constituencies in ways that are at odds with the interests and liberties of individuals or other groups.

Mill makes no distinction between a tyranny of one and a tyranny of many. A tyrannical majority running roughshod over the rights of individuals and minorities is no less a tyrant because it is a majority, because it is elected, or because it is elected by a majority.

While society may not tolerate criminal behavior, for example, society may not legitimately interfere with or suppress all non-conforming behaviors indiscriminately or because a majority may not approve. What then are the powers that society may legitimately exercise over the individual? Mill answers:

"The only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."

-J.S. Mill, On Liberty

James Madison -called the "Father of the Constitution" -may have anticipated Mill's ideas in his draft of the Bill of Rights -the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Implicit in the Bill of Rights is the recognition that the power of the state is a blunt instrument. Abused, it can oppress and repress individuals and minority groups alike. The Bill of Rights addresses this issue by guaranteeing "due process of law", limiting state power over individuals and groups, guaranteeing that groups and individuals may speak freely, worship freely.

The Fourth Amendment specifically is a promise that our government made to us in its very founding:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

-Fourth Amendment, Bill of Rights, U.S. Constitution

Let's make something abundantly clear: there are no "inherent powers", "Implicit" authorizations" that would, in any way, overturn, limit, or repeal the Fourth Amendment. Many politicians are not only wrong about that, they may have deliberately lied about it. Moreover, Congress may not overrule the Fourth Amendment with statutory law. Constitutional Law is supreme and provisions in the Bill of Right are valid until amended as set out in the Constitution itself. Widespread domestic surveillance is illegal whatever is done by Congress ex post facto -and until the Constitution is amended, it will remain illegal. At last, ex post facto laws, themselves, are expressly forbidden by the Constitution.

Mill is all the more remarkable for his insight into issues that remain contemporary. In every literate criticism of "special interest groups", PAC's, the gun lobby, the tobacco lobby, the Military/Industrial Complex, one sees the lasting influence of John Mill.

On Liberty is essential reading for anyone interested in law, the principles of government, political science, political philosophy, indeed, freedom itself. It is also essential reading for anyone interested in learning about the intellectual underpinnings of Anglo-American civil liberties.

See all 213 customer reviews...

On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill PDF
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill EPub
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Doc
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill iBooks
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill rtf
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Mobipocket
On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Kindle

^^ Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Doc

^^ Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Doc

^^ Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Doc
^^ Download PDF On Liberty (Dover Thrift Editions), by John Stuart Mill Doc

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar