Download Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant
Why ought to be book Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant Publication is one of the simple sources to try to find. By getting the writer as well as theme to obtain, you can discover a lot of titles that available their information to acquire. As this Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant, the inspiring publication Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant will give you what you have to cover the work due date. And why should remain in this internet site? We will ask first, have you more times to opt for going shopping guides and look for the referred book Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant in book shop? Many people may not have enough time to locate it.
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant
Download Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant
Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant. It is the time to improve as well as refresh your skill, understanding and also experience consisted of some entertainment for you after long time with monotone points. Operating in the office, going to study, gaining from exam as well as even more activities could be completed and you need to begin new things. If you really feel so exhausted, why do not you try brand-new thing? An extremely easy point? Reviewing Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant is what we provide to you will certainly know. As well as the book with the title Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant is the reference now.
This is why we suggest you to constantly see this web page when you require such book Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant, every book. By online, you may not getting guide store in your city. By this on-line library, you can discover guide that you really want to read after for long time. This Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant, as one of the suggested readings, oftens remain in soft data, as all book collections here. So, you could also not await few days later on to obtain and check out the book Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant.
The soft file suggests that you should visit the web link for downloading and after that conserve Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant You have possessed the book to read, you have actually postured this Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant It is easy as going to guide shops, is it? After getting this brief explanation, hopefully you can download and install one and start to review Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant This book is quite simple to check out each time you have the leisure time.
It's no any kind of mistakes when others with their phone on their hand, as well as you're too. The distinction could last on the product to open Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant When others open the phone for chatting as well as speaking all points, you could sometimes open up and also read the soft file of the Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant Of course, it's unless your phone is available. You can likewise make or save it in your laptop computer or computer system that alleviates you to review Critique Of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), By Immanuel Kant.
In his monumental Critique of Pure Reason, German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argues that human knowledge is limited by the capacity for perception. He attempts a logical designation of two varieties of knowledge: a posteriori, the knowledge acquired through experience; and a priori, knowledge not derived through experience. Kant maintains that the most practical forms of human knowledge employ the a priori judgments that are possible only when the mind determines the conditions of its own experience. This accurate translation by J. M. Meiklejohn offers a simple and direct rendering of Kant's work that is suitable for readers at all levels.
- Sales Rank: #871031 in eBooks
- Published on: 2012-03-07
- Released on: 2012-03-07
- Format: Kindle eBook
Review
"Paul Guyer's and Allen Wood's new translation of Kant's Critique is a superb volume that forms the heart of Cambridge's excellent series of translations of Kant's works. Because of the quality of the translation, but also because of the various supplementary materials which it provides...it will very likely replace Norman Kemp Smith's translation as the standard edition for scholars. It is difficult to imagine that anyone would be able to improve on this volume in the foreseeable future." Eric Watkins, International Philosophical Quarterly
Review
"Paul Guyer's and Allen Wood's new translation of Kant's Critique is a superb volume that forms the heart of Cambridge's excellent series of translations of Kant's works. Because of the quality of the translation, but also because of the various supplementary materials which it provides...it will very likely replace Norman Kemp Smith's translation as the standard edition for scholars. It is difficult to imagine that anyone would be able to improve on this volume in the foreseeable future." Eric Watkins, International Philosophical Quarterly
Language Notes
Text: English (translation)
Original Language: German
Most helpful customer reviews
218 of 236 people found the following review helpful.
If it were easy, you'd read it in grade school
By Philip Sandifer
Let me start by addressing some misconceptions you'll see as you roam around these reviews.
First of all, there are a couple of low reviews that refer to Kant as being "anti-reason," "anti-truth," a socialist, a collectivist, etc. These are written by Objectivists - followers of Ayn Rand. Ayn Rand has about the same relationship to serious philosophy as McDonalds does to good cooking. She hated Kant, but never quite seemed to understand him. No surprise - he's hard.
Which is the second point. This is not an easy book at all. That's why it's most often assigned to graduate students. Even undergrads can easily get a philosophy degree without ever touching this book. It's bloody hard. This is because, well, its ideas are radical and difficult, and because Kant is a careful philosopher.
It is not, and this is my third point, because Kant is a bad writer. Quite the opposite. He's a great writer. The fact of the matter is, though, that his subject matter is not exactly a page-turner. But, I mean, what do you expect. You're reading academic philosophy. There's a handful of academic books that are both worthwhile and fun to read, and that's just a fact of life. Kant, however, is quite clear - indeed, he does the service of going over his points more than once - a luxury you won't get when you advance to Hegel. Furthermore, believe it or not, there are jokes in Kant. The best of them is a footnote, in which he notes that "Deficiancy in judgment is that which is ordinarily referred to as stupidity, and for such a failing their is no remedy."
Unfortunately, it's all too common on Amazon to bash academic books because they're hard, obscure, or poorly written. The fact of the matter is that these books are not for everyone. They're for specialists and scholars, and are written in a language that is appropriately technical to that task. You don't go and bash medical and scientific books for being too hard for you. Give philosophy a break, and recognize this book as what it is - one of the most important contributions to a scholarly field ever.
26 of 27 people found the following review helpful.
Standard translation of landmark text
By Penn Jacobs
Note: this is the edition I'm familiar with, but it's out of print. There are new editions (both with this translation and newer ones) that would be worth checking out. This one has no real guide or preface, but I kind of like that.
Norman Kemp Smith's translation seems to be one of the standard English translations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Is it the best? I don't speak German, but it's certainly serviceable.
This is a daunting work. It's also a necessary work, inasmuch as any understand of contemporary thought and intellectual history must encounter it. Kant has influenced nearly every major school of thought and cultural trend for the last 200 years. Below, I'll try to sketch his thought in this Critique.
This is the story of Immanuel Kant, who found philosophy a mess and sought to fix it. Specifically, he was a former Rationalist who was disconcerted by the critique of British Empiricism (specifically the skeptical philosophy of David Hume). He sought to provide a grounding for the truths of empirical science and mathematics, establish the possibility of religious faith and practice, while at the same time avoid dogmatism in metaphysical reasoning.
How did he seek to do this? By establishing a critique of reason whereby he understands the validity of all mental constructs. Kant distinguish between judgments which are a priori (prior to experience) and a posteriori (arising out of experience), and judgments which are "analytic" (trivial, tautological) and "synthetic" (where the predicate adds something that is not contained within the subject). Are synthetic a priori judgments possible? Kant answers yes, and much of this book deals with what follows from that.
First Kant deals with how we have sense experience. He claims that space and time are necessary a priori conditions for sense experience -- not physical things in the world. The content of our experience is sense-data: raw sensation that arises outside ourselves or inside ourselves and is "given" in experience. The forms in which we construct that experience are space and time.
Sensations, organized within us spatially and temporally yields sense experience (perceptions).
Kant then proceeds to our abstract thought. What he terms "Understanding" has pure, a priori concepts according to logical form. He calls these "Categories." These do NOT arise as a mere empirical habit/convention -- they are prior to experience and are necessary forms that allow rational beings to experience the world intelligibly. Thus, we take the raw givens of our Understanding, which are perceptions (which we dealt with under "Transcendental Aesthetic"), and we impose the categories upon these perceptions -- we "schematize" our experience.
Perceptions, given intelligible form according to schemata, yield intelligible concepts. We are justified in doing this because the perceptions are not things-in-themselves, but mere appearances (phenomena), and in order for these phenomena to exist in an experience that is coherent and consistent for us, they must have these forms. We are NOT justified in applying these categories to things-in-themselves (noumena).
This is where Reason eats itself. It tries to do the same thing the understanding did, but now it does this with respect to the big metaphysical questions. It starts with concepts and attempts to unify all phenomenal experience according to concepts and yield the Ideas of Pure Reason. When it does this, it gets all confuzelled. It tries to deal with 3 Big Problems (Kant uses the term "dialectic"):
* Soul - Reason wants to insist that the thinking soul exists, that it is subject (pure substance), that it is simple, and that it is unchangeable through all its activities. These are the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. We need these ideas -- their contraries are unthinkable for us(?), but these are not demonstrable.
* The World - Reason wants to answer questions about the series of appearances that constitute the world: Is the World limited or unlimited in space and time? Is the world made up of simples or composites? Does freedom exist in the world? Is there a necessary being connected with the world? These are the Antinomies of Pure Reason. Unlike the Paralogisms, these questions admit of contradictory answers. They, too, cannot be adjudicated by pure reason.
* God - Reason wants to demonstrate the existence of God. Kant refers to this as the Ideal of Pure Reason. He claims that all arguments demonstating God's existence in fact, despite outward appearances, depend upon one method, the "ontological" proof of God's existence, which Kant disallows as transempirical.
Kant tries to tell us how to employ reason. First, stop arguing speculatively about God, etc.! But he urges us to apply those metaphysical ideas must be employed in practical (moral) contexts. In this, he anticipates the Victorians, who were somewhat skeptical on matters of faith, but stressed the necessity of continuing to act according to traditional morality. The dialectic problems deals with ideas are not verifiable speculatively. They are not constitutive of experience. Rather, they serve a regulative function, specifically in the practical realm of morality.
Kant claims that reason is architectonic: it naturally wants to assume the greatest generality. Kant says this is fine for moral thinking, but bad for speculative thinking.
Kant says that philosophy answers these questions: "What can I know? What ought I to do? What may I hope for?" The bulk of Critique of Pure Reason answers the first question. The Critique of Practical Reason, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, Metaphysic of Morals, etc., answer the second question. The third question ties the two together -- this is what Kant deals with at the end of the first Critique.
Kant sees the great transendental ideas as being God, Immortality, and Freedom. They are the starting points of theistic religion (e.g. Christianity and Judaism). These can neither be verified nor disproved by speculative reason (since speculative reason must by its nature deal with givens (Latin, data) either from sense-experience or pure intuition (as in mathematics). These ideas, however, are necessary "regulative" ideas for the guidance of practical (moral reason) and are valid in that connection. Thus, the second Critique answers the question "What ought I to do?" by recourse to the transcendal idea of Freedom. The question, "what may I hope for?", is given response through the transcendental ideas of God and immortality, for if God does not exist, nothing can grant us happiness for moral behavior and unhappiness for immoral behavior, and if we're not immortal, God won't have anyone to reward.
I probably have made errors and inaccuracies in the above, but I hope I give a flavor for his thought. Kant is sober, earnest, and disciplined. Again, he's not easy, but I think he's worth the effort.
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
A superb translation in modern English
By Seesaw-Books
Mr Werner S. Pluhar has done us all non-German readers a great favor:
A clear, complete (with a German-English Glossary followed by the English-German Index), fluent translation of Kant's major work.
It's the one I feel to be the most enjoyable and closer to the original.
Patricia Kitcher's Introduction is very helpful to any new Kant's reader.
The editing and format of this edition is well designed and inviting to
the eye.
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant PDF
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant EPub
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant Doc
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant iBooks
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant rtf
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant Mobipocket
Critique of Pure Reason (Dover Philosophical Classics), by Immanuel Kant Kindle
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar